Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 332 SO2D 18 - Hofmann v. Wainwright

Hofmann v. Wainwright’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2011

5 state decisions

2019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Cook v. United States Attorney General · Cooper v. Lockhart · Gaddy v. Michael · Small v. Britton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not require Florida to hold immediate parole revocation hearings for parolees who have been convicted of intervening offenses and are imprisoned elsewhere, either by sending its Parole and Probation Commission out of state or by recalling the prisoner or parolee.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.