Hutton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
August 1988
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. State · 238 So. 2d 618 - State v. Graham · State v. Salem · 304 So. 2d 501 - McQueen v. State · 246 So. 2d 155 - Seymour v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There can be no doubt that an essential element of the crime of receiving stolen property knowing the same to have been stolen, is knowledge by the accused that at the time he received the property it was stolen, or knowledge of such fact as would put a person of ordinary intelligence and caution in inquiry. [Emphasis supplied.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.