Stovall v. Gartrell’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 1984
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Westchester County National Bank · State Ex Rel. Landis v. Thompson · State ex rel. Halliburton v. Roach · McCreary v. Speer · Armstrong v. King
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This principle obviously has no application here. The wars are over, and the armies participating therein were raised and supported by the federal government. The status of the veteran is not that of a soldier in the United States Army, but a Kentucky citizen the legislature and the people deem it proper to recognize because of his past service. This grant of compensation constitutes a recognition of a moral obligation to reimburse Kentuckians for losses suffered by reason of military service. It has nothing whatever to do with raising and supporting armies, (our emphasis) “Amicus Curiae also cites People v. Westchester County National Bank, 231 N.Y. 465 , 132 N.E. 241 , 15 A.L.R. 1344 . As we read that case the New York court did not determine that the attempt of the state to give a soldiers’ bonus was an invasion of federal power, but decided that the state has no legal obligation to a veteran. “We do not understand that amicus curiae is raising the question of whether or not the granting of a veterans’ bonus by the legislature or the people is a legitimate public purpose. Since the problem is presented, however, by his reliance upon the Westchester Bank case, just cited, and since it is • important to our determination of the true nature of the proposal submitted to the people (to be hereafter discussed) we will pass upon it. “The problem was apparently settled by the decision of this Court in Bosworth v. Harp, 154 Ky. 559 , 157 S.W. 1084 , 45 L.R.A.,N.S., 692. Though tha”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Grise v. Combs““Are you in favor of the issuance and sale of bonds to pay a bonus to veterans of the Spanish American War, World War I, World War II and the Korean Conflict, which bonds shall be paid from the proceeds of a tax levied upon retail sales ?””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.