Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 332 S.W.2d 896 - State v. Roberts

State v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 1968
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ramsey · State v. Turner · State v. Daegele · State v. Whitaker · State v. Fine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The verdict was against the weight of the evidence.’ State v. Benjamin, Mo., 309 S.W.2d 602, 607 (10); State v. Hall, supra (4). “ ‘The verdict was against the law.’ State v. Daegele, Mo., 302 S.W.2d 20, 22 (2). “ ‘The verdict was against the law and the evidence.’ State v. Turner, Mo., 320 S.W.2d 579, 586 (17). “ ‘The closing argument on behalf of the State was an appeal to bias and prejudice.’ State v. Mathews, Mo., 328 S.W.2d 642, 645 (5); State v. Ruffin, Mo., 286 S.W.2d 743, 749 (20).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.