Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 332 SW3D 704 - In Re Smith

In Re Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Fourth Court of Appeals · In Re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P. · Champion International Corp. v. Twelfth Court of Appeals · Cantu v. Longoria · In Re Lufkin Industries, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]ever ... did we state the proposition ... that the appellate court should review the entire record, as in an ordinary appeal, in our mandamus review”). . See also Angelina Cas. Co. v. Fisher, 319 S.W.2d 387, 388 (Tex.Civ.App.-Beaumont 1962) (noting that if a trial court is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.