Haley v. Ohio’s Empirical Analysis
332 U.S. 596 · 1948
Citation profile
558 federal appellate · 51 district · 993 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 2,009 later decisions (124 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2026 · most notably Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera (1966), Schneckloth v. Bustamonte (1973)
558 federal appellate · 51 district · 993 state decisions — followed in 45 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McNabb v. United States · Lisenba v. People of State of California · Brown v. State of Mississippi · Chambers v. Florida
Cited together with Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gallegos v. State of Colorado · Gault · Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee · Culombe v. Connecticut
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,009 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Neither man nor child can be allowed to stand condemned by methods which flout constitutional requirements of due process of law.'”
72 later decisions quote this exact passage““But the ruling of the trial court and the finding of the jury on the voluntary character of the confession do not foreclose the independent examination which it is our duty to make here. Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee, 322 U.S. 143, 147, 148 , 64 S.Ct. 921, 923 , 88 L.Ed. 1192 . If the undisputed evidence suggests that force or coercion was used to exact the confession, we will not permit the judgment of conviction to stand even though without the confession there might have been sufficient evidence for submission to the jury. Malinski v. People of State of New York, supra, 324 U.S. [401] at page 404, 65 S.Ct. [781] at page 783, 89 L.Ed. 1029 , and cases cited.””
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“Beginning shortly after midnight this 15-year old lad was questioned by the police for about five hours. Five or six of the police questioned him in relays of one or two each. During this time no friend or counsel of the boy was present. Around 5 a.m. — after being shown al leged confessions of Lowder and Parks — the boy confessed ...”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Doody v. Schriro · Doody v. Ryan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.