Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 332 WIS2D 331 - State v. Eison

State v. Eison’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Neder v. United States · 39 Wis. 2d 754 - State v. Hutnik · State v. Harvey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether evidence is relevant under Wis. Stat. § 904.02 and should be admitted lies within the discretion of the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.