In Re Cleaver’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 11 U.S.C. § 111 (§ 106 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 521
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Cohen v. De La Cruz · United Air Lines, Inc. v. McMann · Rousey v. Jacoway · In Re Watson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(h)(1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), and notwithstanding any other provision of this section, an individual may not be a debtor under this title unless such individual has, during the 180-day period preceding the date of filing of the petition by such individual, received from an approved nonprofit budget and credit counseling agency described in section 111(a) an individual or group briefing (including a briefing conducted by telephone or on the Internet) that outlined the opportunities for available credit counseling and assisted such individual in performing a related budget analysis.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Wallace · In Re Mingueta“(3)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), the requirements of paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to a debtor who submits to the court a certification that— (i) describes exigent circumstances that merit a waiver of the requirements of paragraph (1); (ii) states that the debtor requested credit counseling services from an approved nonprofit budget and credit counseling agency, but was unable to obtain the services referred to in paragraph (1) during the 5-day period beginning on the date on which the debtor made the request; and (iii) is satisfactory to the court.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Mingueta · In Re Graham“1. To bear witness; testify <attest to the defendant's innocence>. 2. To affirm to be true or genuine; to authenticate by signing as a witness < attest the will>.” Id. at 124 . Similarly, Webster’s Third New International Dictionary defines”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Fields · In Re Cobb
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.