333 F.2d 1019
Docket No. 19110.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
May 21, 1964.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1964-05-21
2 counsel of record
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Nye & Nissen v. United States · Rodriguez v. New York
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1964-05-21
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2016
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
Clarence A. Abbott, in pro. per.
Francis C. Whelan, U. S. Atty., Donald A. Fareed, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chief, Civil Section, Jacqueline L. Weiss, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before JERTBERG, BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Abbott appeals from an order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The order is affirmed for the reasons stated by the trial judge in his opinion.