Frith v. Celebrezze’s Empirical Analysis
333 F.2d 557 · 1964
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently January 2002 · most notably Wiggins v. Schweiker (1982), Lewin v. Schwieker (1981)
23 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kerner v. Flemming · Hayes v. Celebrezze · Page v. Celebrezze · Celebrezze v. O'Brient · Hicks v. Flemming
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he findings of the Secretary as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive * * *.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“* * * inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or be of long-continued and indefinite duration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mann v. Gardner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.