Williams v. Wiseman’s Empirical Analysis
333 F.2d 810 · 1964
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2017
10 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co. · Flora v. United States · Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. · Botta v. Scanlon · Vuin v. Burton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The assessment of the tax is, of course, presumptively correct and in order to establish federal court jurisdiction for injunctive relief, more is required than bare allegations of illegality, even though such allegations may ultimately be sustained. [ 333 F.2d at 811 ].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.