Cohen v. Curtis Publishing Co.’s Empirical Analysis
333 F.2d 974 · 1964
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Addington v. Farmer's Elevator Mutual Insurance (1981), Director of Revenue v. United States (1968)
24 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Southern Railway Co. v. Jackson · Mosier v. Federal Reserve Bank · United States v. Muschany · Agostino v. Ellamar Packing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Judgment Upon Multiple Claims or Involving Multiple Parties. When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, or when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment. In the absence of such determination and direction, any order or other form of decision, however designated, which adjudicates fewer than all the parties shall not terminate the action as to any of the claims or parties, and the order or other form of decision is subject to revision at any time before the entry of judgment adjudicating all the claims and the rights and liabilities of all the parties.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“motion * * * presented no * * * substantial issue of fact or law * * * as would justify this court, in the interest of justice, overlooking * * * disregard of the time rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.