Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 333 F.3d 429 - Peachlum v. City of York

Peachlum v. City of York’s Empirical Analysis

333 F.3d 429 · 2003

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
1
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably Constitution Party v. Aichele (2014), County Concrete Corp. v. Township of Roxbury (2006)

22 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions

400200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Singleton v. Wulff · Califano v. Sanders · Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “determine whether a party has brought an action prematurely and counsels abstention until such time as a dispute is sufficiently concrete to satisfy the constitutional and prudential requirements of the doctrine.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) `the fitness of the issues for judicial decision,' and (2) `the hardship to the parties of withholding court consideration.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “genuinely aggrieved so as to avoid expenditure of judicial resources on matters which have caused harm to no one.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.