Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 333 FAPPX 1 - Knight v. Kellogg Brown & Root Inc.

Knight v. Kellogg Brown & Root Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
November 2014
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Little v. Liquid Air Corp. · Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, Inc. · Templet v. Hydrochem Inc. · Baranowski v. Hart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A Rule 59(e) motion “serves the narrow purpose of allowing a party to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence” and “is not the proper vehicle for rehashing evidence, legal theories, or arguments that could have been offered or raised before the entry of judgment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.