Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

333 F. App'x 894

United States v. Baker

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 20, 2009

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2009-10-20

Relies on Bussell v. United States · United States v. Agofsky

Decided 2009-10-20

PER CURIAM: *

¶1Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Samuel E. Baker, Jr., raises arguments that under the law of the case doctrine are foreclosed. See United States v. Agofsky, 516 F.3d 280, 283 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 64, 172 L.Ed.2d 61 (2008). The appellant’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

¶2 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

/333/fappx/894 · .json · Public domain