Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 333 F. Supp. 2d 960 - Sherman v. McDaniel

333 F. Supp. 2d 960 - Sherman v. McDaniel’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
July 2013
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Washington v. Texas · Keeney v. Tamayo-Reyes · Harris v. Nelson · Bracy v. Gramley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For the most part, at the heart of these claims, petitioner essentially asserts that his trial counsel unreasonably failed to seek the discovery that petitioner seeks now. If not more than that were required for a showing of good cause under Bracy , habeas petitioners would have a free pass to conduct any discovery remotely related to their ease.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.