Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 333 Md. 84 - Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Robinson v. State (1999), State v. Bonner (1998)

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

1201993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Solem v. Helm · Harmelin v. Michigan · Rummel v. Estelle · Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe · Illinois Power Co. v. Local Union No. 51, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The sentence is not the result of a recidivist history. The sentence was not based on any legislative or judicial decision to impose severe penalties to deter domestic violence because of its societal impact. In fact, the record indicates that the sentence was based on speculation by the trial judge concerning the life span of the victim. None of those considerations lend any legitimacy to a sentence that seems to be grossly disproportionate.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[W]hen a defendant is charged with a greater offense and a lesser included offense based on the same conduct, with jeopardy attaching to both charges at trial, and when the defendant is convicted only of the lesser included charge, he may not receive a sentence for that conviction which exceeds the maximum sentence which could have been imposed had he been convicted of the greater charge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.