¶1Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed, review limited to bill of particulars issues as follows: 1) whether Judge Seay properly ruled on the bill of particulars 2) whether Judge Walker erred in permitting a variance. By order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of February 1993.
333 N.C. 348
State v. Stallings
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 11, 1993
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1993-02-11
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1993-02-11
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2010
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →