State v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably State v. Buchanan (2001), 751 So. 2d 537 - Goodwin v. State (1999)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Mendenhall · Oregon v. Elstad · Oregon v. Mathiason
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]n attempt by a defendant to intimidate a witness in an effort to prevent the witness from testifying or to induce the witness to testify falsely in his favor is relevant to show the defendant's awareness of his guilt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“the defendant has the burden of establishing prejudice by showing that `there is a reasonable possibility ... a different result would have been reached at the trial [absent the error]'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the admission of the defendant's first confession in violation of the Miranda exclusionary rule was harmless * beyond a reasonable doubt”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Malachi
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.