State v. Tibbetts’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 2014
1 district · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 75 Wis. 2d 244 - Klimas v. State · State v. Ford · State v. Lohnes · State v. Cody · Patino v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A court may correct an illegal sentence at any time and may correct a sentence imposed in an illegal manner within the time provided in this section for the reduction of sentence. (Emphasis supplied mine.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bucholz · State v. Bayer“a trial court may not use SDCL 23A-31-1 to increase the length of the sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sieler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.