State v. Jensen’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably State v. Jackson (2008), Hawkins v. State (1985)
41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 753
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Green v. United States · Estelle v. Smith · Wade v. Hunter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Every law that makes an action done before the passing of the law, and which was innocent when done, criminal; and punishes such action. 2. Every law that aggravates a crime, or makes it greater than it was, when committed. 3. Every law that changes the punishment, and inflicts a greater punishment, than the law annexed to the crime, when committed. 4. Every law that alters the legal rules of evidence and receives less, or different, testimony, than the law required at the time of the commission of the offense, in order to convict the offender.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Haverluk · State v. Burr““[Although § 12.1-01-01(2), N.D.C.C., states that the provisions of Title 12.1 do not apply to offenses committed prior to its effective date, § 12.1 — 01—01(3)(b), N.D.C.C., provides for the following exception: ‘3. In cases pending on or after the effective date of this title, and involving offenses committed prior thereto: [[Image here]] ‘b. The court, with the consent of the defendant, may impose sentence under the provisions of this title which are applicable to the offense and the offender.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jensen“is one which applies to a specific locality or spot, as distinguished from a law which operates generally throughout the entire state....'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.