Mammano v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2021
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 84 Okla. Crim. 176 - Storer v. State · 12 Okla. Crim. 417 - Gransden v. State · 90 Okla. Crim. 1 - Anderson v. State · 8 Okla. Crim. 152 - Boswell v. State · 16 Okla. Crim. 602 - Burton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Thereupon the burden of proof shifts to the defendant; and to discharge it he must produce evidence sufficient in quality and quantity to raise a reason able doubt, either as to the degree of the homicide, or as to whether he was justifiable or excusable, failing in which a conviction for murder is warranted.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cottrell v. State““Alleged error in the giving of an instruction will not be considered on appeal in the absence of an exception saved to the giving of such instruction, unless it is so basically erroneous as to mislead and confuse the jury as to the issues of the case.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Clark v. State“when there is a reasonable ground to apprehend a design to commit a felony,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.