Hanlen v. Gessler’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. Cherry · Board of County Commissioners v. Vail Associates, Inc. · Fognani v. Young · Regular Rt. Com. Carrier Conf. v. Puc · Board of County Commissioners of the County of San Miguel v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“commit a breach or neglect of duty or other wrongful act,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kuhn v. Williams · Carson v. Reiner“): A petition ... that has been verified and appears to be sufficient under this code shall be deemed valid unless a petition for review of the validity of the petition pursuant to section 1-1-113 is filed with the district court within five days after the election official's statement of sufficiency is issued.... (Emphases added.) Thus, the Election Code expressly contemplates that, within a narrow, five-day window after the election official issues a statement of sufficiency, a challenge to the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Kuhn v. Williams“Upon filing, the designated election official for the political subdivision shall review all petition information and verify the information against the registration records , and, where applicable, the county assessor's records.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kuhn v. Williams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.