Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 333 SC 585 - State v. Holliday

State v. Holliday’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2005
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Long · State v. Holliday · State v. Robinson · Frasier v. State · State v. Kimsey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To establish duress which will excuse a criminal act, the degree of coercion must be present, imminent, and of such a nature as to induce a well-grounded apprehension of death or serious bodily harm if the act is not done. Coercion is no defense if there is any reasonable way, other than committing the crime, to escape the threat of harm. The fear of injury must be reasonable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.