333 So. 2d 190 - Madison v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 1985
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 53 Ala. App. 330 - Funches v. State · Viberg v. State · 44 Ala. App. 275 - Riggens v. State · 47 Ala. App. 308 - Bray v. State · Fowler v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Whether there was a variance between the indictment and the evidence, by reason of the allegation in the indictment that the property involved was ‘the property of James B. Walden’ and the evidence that showed that Central Jewelry and Loan Company owned the property, that Walden was the manager of the store of Central Jewelry and Loan Company and that the property was in his custody at the time it was taken.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cogburn v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.