Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 333 SW3D 459 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Atkins v. Virginia · Estelle v. Smith · Buchanan v. Kentucky · State v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To demonstrate prejudice [by counsel's ineffective assistance], a movant must show that, but for counsel's poor performance, there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of the [trial] would have been different.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Pleading defects cannot be remedied by the presentation of evidence and refinement of a claim on appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “any allegations or issues that are not raised in the [postconviction] motion are waived on appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.