Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 333 SW3D 661 - Avilez v. State

Avilez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 262nd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Liteky et al United States · Brown v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law,” rather than the Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. See U.S. Const, amends. IV & V. This presumption comports with his argument and with article 1.03 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which provides that the Code of Criminal Procedure seeks, among other things, to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.