Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 333 U.S. 496 - Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. South Texas Lumber Co

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. South Texas Lumber Co’s Empirical Analysis

333 U.S. 496 · 1948

Citation profile

2,076
cited by 2,076 later decisions
42
cited 42 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

999 federal appellate · 76 district · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,076 later decisions (42 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2018 · most notably United States v. Cartwright (1973), Bingler v. Johnson (1969)

999 federal appellate · 76 district · 27 state decisions

582019481950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedCommissioner of Internal Revenue v. Shenandoah Co. (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 112

Relies on United States v. Anderson · Fawcus Mach Co v. United States · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wheeler · Burnet v. S. & L. Building Corp.

Cited together with United States v. Correll · Fawcus Mach Co v. United States · Bingler v. Johnson · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Portland Cement Company of Utah · National Muffler Dealers Assn., Inc. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,076 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must be sustained unless unreasonable and plainly inconsistent with the revenue statutes.”
    86 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The installment basis of reporting was enacted, as shown by its history, to relieve taxpayers who adopted it from having to pay an income tax in the year of sale based on the full amount of anticipated profits when in fact they had received in cash only a small portion of the sales price. Another reason was the difficult and time-consuming effort of appraising the uncertain market value of installment obligations.””
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a corporation computing income on the installment basis as provided in section 44 shall, with respect to the installment transactions, compute earnings and profits on such basis.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.