333 Wis. 2d 157 - State v. Gilbert’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · State v. Pettit · Alberte v. Anew Health Care Services, Inc. · 2005 WI App 190 - Patrick Fur Farm, Inc. v. United Vaccines, Inc. · Prn Associates LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of Administration
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f a person committed under s. 980.06 is incarcerated at a county jail, state correctional institution, or federal correction institution for a new criminal charge or conviction or because his or her parole was revoked, any reporting requirement. .. does not apply during the incarceration period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gilbert“Upon the filing of a petition under s. 980.02, the court shall review the petition to determine whether to issue an order for detention of the person who is the subject of the petition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gilbert“[i]f the person is serving a sentence of imprisonment, . . . the court shall order that the person be transferred to a detention facility approved by”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gilbert
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.