Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 333 Wis. 2d 690 - State v. Below

333 Wis. 2d 690 - State v. Below’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 208 Wis. 2d 166 - In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. Cook · 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger · State v. Watkins · 85 Wis. 2d 722 - Cranmore v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he trier of fact is the sole arbiter of the credibility of the witnesses and alone is charged with the duty of weighing the evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “is whether the defendant's actions were a substantial factor in causing the victim's death. Id. Because the circuit court in the present case determined that it was bound by Below and not Burrage , it concluded that the substantial factor instruction was sufficient. ¶8”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “When more than one inference can reasonably be drawn from the evidence, the inference which supports the trier of fact's verdict must be the one followed on review unless the evidence is incredible as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.