United States v. Sette’s Empirical Analysis
334 F.2d 267 · 1964
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2019
13 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 26 U.S.C. § 4411
Relies on Ingram v. United States · United States v. Calamaro · Ditson v. California · United States v. Orion T. Whiting, Jr., and Lucretia Killings · United States v. Marquez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the very officers who were in charge of the investigation,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We are cited to no case, and have found none, that remotely justifies this highly unusual method of establishing a prima facie case in a criminal prosecution of this type.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“their observations and their general knowledge of the gambling business”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. U.S. v. Garcia
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.