Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 334 F.2d 319 - Weaver v. United States

Weaver v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

334 F.2d 319 · 1964

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
January 2000
most recently cited

15 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2000

15 federal appellate ·

8019641970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)

Relies on Richards v. United States · City of Tulsa v. Harman · Alaniz v. United States · United States v. Gregory · Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Barnes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “recovery is allowed in Oklahoma only where the unsafe condition is known to the owner and not to the invitee.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.