Hickock v. Crouse’s Empirical Analysis
334 F.2d 95 · 1964
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently February 2006 · most notably 23 Cal. 3d 412 - People v. Pope (1979), Williams v. Beto (1965)
39 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Townsend v. Sain · Fay v. Noia · Irvin v. Dowd · Stein v. People of State of New York Wissner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““State prisoners are entitled to relief on federal habeas corpus only upon proving that their detention violates the fundamental liberties of the person, safeguarded against state action by the Federal Constitution.””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The law is well settled that in a proceeding such as this, the only errors of a state court which may be considered are those which deprive an accused of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States. ' 28 U.S.C. § 2241 ;” and cases cited.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“good-faith representation, with all the skill which counsel possesses”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.