Crowe v. Jp Bolduc’s Empirical Analysis
334 F.3d 124 · 2003
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 10 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably In Re Olympic Mills Corporation, Crowe v. Jp Bolduc (2004)
21 federal appellate · 10 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Alternative Energy Inc Beaver-Cadillac Gp Inc Beaver Plant Operations Inc Christopher Hutchins v. St Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company · United States v. Cresta · United States v. Nelson-Rodriguez · United States v. Holmquist
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to clarify whether an in limine or other evidentiary ruling is definitive when there is doubt on that point.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“makes a definitive ruling on the record admitting ... evidence, either at or before trial, a party need not renew an objection... to preserve a claim of error for appeal.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A motion for judgment as a matter of law only may be granted when, after examining the evidence of record and drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party, the record reveals no sufficient evidentiary basis for the verdict. This review is weighted toward preservation of the jury verdict, which stands unless the evidence was so strongly and overwhelmingly inconsistent with the verdict that no reasonable jury could have returned it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.