Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 334 F.3d 1314 - Omega Engineering, Inc. v. Raytek Corp.

Omega Engineering, Inc. v. Raytek Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

334 F.3d 1314 · 2003

Citation profile

348
cited by 348 later decisions
March 2025
most recently cited

92 federal appellate · 64 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 348 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Innova/Pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (2004), Chimie v. Ppg Industries Inc (2005)

92 federal appellate · 64 district ·

1830200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City Calmar Inc · Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic Inc · Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-Cross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 348 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here the patentee has unequivocally disavowed a certain meaning to obtain his patent, the doctrine of prosecution disclaimer attaches and narrows the ordinary meaning of the claim congruent with the scope of the surrender.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[F]or prosecution disclaimer to attach, our precedent requires that the alleged disavowing actions or statements made during prosecution be both clear and unmistakable.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]his court ... considers the prosecution history to determine whether the applicant clearly and unambiguously disclaimed or disavowed any interpretation during prosecution in order to obtain claim allowance.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.