United States v. Randall

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 22, 2009

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2009-10-22

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3582

Decided 2009-10-22

¶1Mfirnied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Jeron Rondell Randall appeals the district court's order granting his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, United States v. Randall, No. 4:95-cr-00058-H-2 (E.D.N.C. June 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.