De Costa v. Rodrigues’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1104 (§ 404 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1105 (§ 405 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1109 (§ 409 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 152 (§ 2 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Rose v. Long Island Railroad Pension Plan · California Ironworkers Field Pension Trust v. Loomis Sayles & Co. · Madeja v. Olympic Packers, LLC · No. 88-2594 · CSA 401(K) Plan v. Pension Professionals, Inc.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.