York v. the State’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Doggett v. United States · Bradshaw v. State · Ruffin v. State · In re Lang
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether this witness's testimony would have been favorable[; instead,] the trial court [simply] concluded that [Ellis] suffered no prejudice because the [allegedly exculpatory] witness's death occurred before [the] case first appeared on a trial calendar.... As noted above, however, the trial court failed to consider the pretrial delay between [the arrest in February 2013] and the first scheduled trial date of [November 2013]. If [material] witnesses die or disappear during a delay, the prejudice is obvious[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The pretrial delay is measured from the accused's arrest, indictment, or other formal accusation, whichever comes first, to the trial or, if the accused files a motion to dismiss the indictment, until the trial court denies the motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the trial court failed to consider the delay between the [arrest] in [February 2013] and the first call to trial in [November 2013].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.