Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 334 ILLAPP 399 - Morton v. Raphael

Morton v. Raphael’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co. · 233 Mo. App. 397 - Kurfiss v. Cowherd · Phillips v. W. G. N., Inc. · Frohman v. Ferris · Rees v. Peltzer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ Aside from the legal questions involved, it is difficult to perceive how plaintiff could be injured by the advertisement in question. Defendants made no claim to have painted the murals. They were interior decorators and claimed only to have redecorated the room, which they did. The-authorship of the murals is nowhere denied in the advertisement, and plaintiff offers no authority that defendants were under any legal duty to recite her name therein as a painter. If the murals were as artistic and effective as all' the parties concede, it would seem that plaintiff was rather benefited from the publicity afforded, than damaged thereby, and it would be quite strained to hold that her name, reputation and income as an artist had been seriously and permanently damaged.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.