Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 334 Mo. 91 - State Ex Rel. Williams v. Daues

State Ex Rel. Williams v. Daues’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 1974
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 1974

11 state decisions

6019331940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. · Burton v. Chicago & Alton Railroad · State ex rel. O'Briant v. Keokuk & Western Railroad · Niedringhaus v. William F. Niedringhaus Investment Co. · Ladd v. Couzins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We hold that the circuit court did not have jurisdiction to set aside its judgment rendered at its October Term, 1928, while the order granting an appeal from that judgment stood unrevoked and in force, and that its order attempting so to do was a nullity. The said October Term judgment is therefore the final judgment in the cause.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.