Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 334 NW2D 217 - State v. Peters

State v. Peters’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2021

6 state decisions

3019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wells v. Pennington County · State Theatre Co. v. Smith · Pederson v. Canton Township · Lien v. Rowe · Costain v. Turner County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Except for ... unimproved section lines not commonly used as public rights-of-way and never altered from their natural state in any way for the purpose of facilitating vehicular passage ..., § 41-9-1 does not apply to ... hunting on highways or other public rights-of-way within this state....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`in ascertaining the intention of the statute, the court's interpretation should not prejudice the public interest or impair an existing right unless language within the statute requiring it to have such operation is so clear that no reasonable doubt can exist of such intention.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the usual liberal construction allowing public use of section lines cannot be extended to this section line because it benefits only hunters and goes nowhere from the east end.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.