State v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 2010
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Waubun Nuwi Nini ( 11671) · State v. Stunkard · State v. Devine · State, Division of Human Rights ex rel. Shaw v. Cherrington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We find that we are unable to agree with the State’s interpretation of this amendment [SDCL 23A-32-4], The phrase “on statutory grounds or otherwise” does not expand the State’s right to appeal. On the contrary, these words simply refer to the grounds on which the trial court grants a “motion to dismiss an indictment or information.” Although we see serious problems with the action taken by the trial court in this case, we must conclude SDCL 2SA-32-4. does not give us jurisdiction to review this acquittal of aggravated assault and conviction of simple assault.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Reath
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.