334 Pa. Super. 145 - Commonwealth v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
September 2012
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Amos · Commonwealth v. Smith · Commonwealth v. Beck · Commonwealth v. Horne · Commonwealth v. Perkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[hJlis criminal liability as an accomplice was advanced repeatedly during the trial in which he attempted to transfer criminal responsibility to [the co-defendant]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“was tried separately and was also found guilty of aggravated assault.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. D.B. v. State“was scheduled originally to be tried jointly with [a co-defendant]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. D.B. v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.