State v. Tucker’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably People v. Rountree (2013), State v. Knoten (2001)
4 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Mu'Min v. Virginia · McDonald v. Missouri · State v. Adams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Adams, 322 S.C. at 123-24 , 470 S.E.2d at 371-72 . Unless a discriminatory intent is inherent in the proponent's explanation, the reason offered will be deemed race-neutral. State v. Tucker, 334 S.C. 1 , 512 S.E.2d 99 (1999); Payton v. Kearse, 329 S.C. 51 , 495 S.E.2d 205 (1998). South Carolina rejected the dual motivation doctrine in the Batson context. Payton, 329 S.C. at 59-60 , 495 S.E.2d at 210 . We adopted the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cochran“unlawfully seize[s], confine[s], inveigle[s], decoy[s], kidnap[s], abduct[s] or carr[ies] away any other person by any means whatsoever without authority of law, except when a minor is seized or taken by his parent, . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Porter“[kjidnap-ing is a continuing offense. The offense commences when one is wrongfully deprived of freedom and continues until freedom is restored.”); Kemple v. State, 725 S.W.2d 483, 485 (Tex.Ct.App.1987) (stating that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Legg
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.