Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 334 So. 2d 13 - Shaw v. Shaw

334 So. 2d 13 - Shaw v. Shaw’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

431
cited by 431 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

427 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 431 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably 397 So. 2d 1120 - Tibbs v. State (1981), 748 So. 2d 1028 - Stephens v. State (1999)

427 state decisions

173019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Catlett v. Chestnut, as Exr. · 265 So. 2d 43 - Westerman v. Shell's City, Inc. · Howell v. Blackburn · Cole v. Cole · 82 So. 2d 504 - Goldfarb v. Robertson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 431 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to evaluate and weigh the testimony and evidence based upon its observation of the bearing, demeanor, and credibility of the witnesses.”
    37 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]t is not the prerogative of an appellate court, upon a de novo consideration of the record, to substitute its judgment for that of the trial court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “* * * * * * “* * * Although the appellate court concluded that it would be ‘prudent’ in its judgment to include such a reservation of jurisdiction, it was not error for the trial court to fail to do so. Goldfarb v. Robertson, 82 So.2d 504, 506 (Fla.1955).” ******”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.