Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 334 SO2D 20 - Goldtrap v. Askew

Goldtrap v. Askew’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
4
states following
February 1982
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Shelton v. Tucker · Saxbe v. Washington Post Co. · 2 Cal. 3d 259 - City of Carmel-By-The-Sea v. Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Florida has a compelling interest in protecting its citizens from abuse of the trust placed in their elected officials”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.