Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 334 SO2D 277 - Orange v. State

Orange v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 1980
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Yost v. State · 316 So. 2d 539 - Slater v. State · 313 So. 2d 692 - Estevez v. State · 322 So. 2d 477 - Jenkins v. Wainwright · 54 So. 2d 190 - Mixon v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen a defendant is convicted of two crimes committed in a single transaction and each of the crimes is a facet of the same transaction, it has been held repeatedly that sentence should be imposed for only one of the crimes, being that of the highest offense charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.