Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 334 SO2D 37 - Frankel v. Bernstein

Frankel v. Bernstein’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1990
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Moon v. Wilson · Enid Corporation v. Mills · Warnecke v. Estate of Rabenau · Taylor v. Rosman · Whidden v. Sunny South Packing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here a contract is one which, according to its provisions and purposes, may not be as well and fully performed by the personal representative of a contracting party as by the decedent, it would be illogical to assume, in the absence of a provision to the contrary in the contract, that the parties should not have anticipated that upon death of such party during pendency of the contract (or as here prior to its inception), the representative of the deceased party need not perform, such as would result where performance is rendered actually impossible by an act of God. See Moon v. Wilson, 100 Fla. 791 , 130 So. 25 ; Enid Corporation v. Mills, Fla.App. 1958, 101 So.2d 906 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “From the terms of the lease and the surrounding circumstances it was shown the lease was intended to be only a personal obligation of the lessee, through restriction of its use to be for her residence, from which, necessarily, there may be implied a condition that her death would terminate the lease — a feature against which the lessor could, but in this instance did not, seek protection by some express provision in the léase.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.