Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 334 SO2D 376 - Carter v. State

Carter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2016

8 state decisions

4019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. State · 334 So. 2d 369 - Ex Parte Dennis · Ratcliff v. State · 305 So. 2d 351 - Grant v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as used in Section Twenty-nine of the Mississippi Constitution of 1890. Indeed the statute now under consideration does not at any place contain any phrase such as”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(emphasis added), as argued in appellant's brief. It is to be noted that language of the statute does not limit its application to a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “By clear and unambiguous language, § 43-21-31 simply confers upon circuit courts exclusive jurisdiction if the crime charged is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.