Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 334 So. 2d 383 - State v. Hamilton

334 So. 2d 383 - State v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 1990
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1990

5 state decisions

30197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The basic function of the specific indictment form is to inform the accused of the crime charged, reserving a recital of the details of the offense for the bill of particulars.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.